Sort by
Refine Your Search
-
Listed
-
Category
-
Country
-
Employer
- Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare
- University of British Columbia
- Forschungszentrum Jülich
- Cardiff University
- American University
- Instituto Nacional de Investigação Agrária e Veterinária, I.P.
- Northern Alberta Institute of Technology
- Universidade de Coimbra
- University of Minho
- University of Oxford
- National Research Council Canada
- Zintellect
- DAAD
- DURHAM UNIVERSITY
- LINGNAN UNIVERSITY
- Tilburg University
- UNIVERSIDAD POLITECNICA DE MADRID
- University of Oxford;
- Angelo State University
- Aston University
- BIOGIPUZKOA HEALTH RESEARCH INSTITUTE
- Boston Children's Hospital
- Deakin University
- Durham University
- Emory University
- McGill University
- Middlesex University
- Midlands Graduate School Doctoral Training Partnership
- Midlands Graduate School Doctoral Training Partnership;
- Missouri University of Science and Technology
- National Institute of Information and Communications Technology
- New York University
- Osaka University
- Rutgers University
- The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
- The University of Osaka
- Tohoku University
- University College Cork
- University of Arkansas
- University of California, San Francisco
- University of Cambridge
- University of Florida
- University of London
- University of Melbourne
- University of Minnesota
- University of Northern British Columbia
- University of Oklahoma
- University of Sheffield
- University of Stirling
- University of Toronto
- University of Utah
- University of Washington
- Utrecht University
- Virginia Tech
- Wroclaw University of Science and Technology
- York St John University
- 46 more »
- « less
-
Field
-
to a campus culture that promotes belonging and community engagement. The Assessment, Evaluation, & Research Graduate Assistant (GA) advances the Center for Student Belonging’s commitment to data
-
Public selection procedure is based on qualifications and on the interview. The Evaluation Committee will grade each candidate with a maximum of 200 points, divided as follows: - 60 points to grade
-
Public selection procedure is based on qualifications and on the interview. The Evaluation Committee will grade each candidate with a maximum of 200 points, divided as follows: - 60 points to grade
-
process Public selection procedure is based on qualifications and on the interview. The Evaluation Committee will grade each candidate with a maximum of 200 points, divided as follows: - 60 points to grade
-
procedure is based on qualifications and on the interview. The Evaluation Committee will grade each candidate with a maximum of 200 points, divided as follows: - 60 points to grade the quality
-
, namely the availability for the development of the field work, within INIAV, I.P. working hours; 5. Other documents that the applicant considers relevant for the evaluation of his/her technical and
-
the Innovation and Digital Transition Program (COMPETE 2030) of Portugal 2030. VII - Selection Methods: Evaluation of the academic record (AR) and/or Interview (I) VII.I - AR - In the evaluation of the academic
-
letter; d) statement proving that meets the conditions for the grant typology, according to the application requirements (Annex 2); e) other documents important to the evaluation process (if applicable
-
the evaluation process (if applicable). LanguagesENGLISHLevelGood Research FieldTechnology » Medical technology Additional Information Benefits Amount of the research grant: The value stipend (Monthly Maintenance
-
the evaluation process (if applicable). LanguagesENGLISHLevelGood Research FieldTechnology » Medical technology Additional Information Benefits Amount of the research grant: The value stipend (Monthly Maintenance