Sort by
Refine Your Search
-
Listed
-
Category
-
Employer
- REQUIMTE - Rede de Quimica e Tecnologia
- Universidade de Coimbra
- FCiências.ID
- FEUP
- Faculty of Sciences of the University of Porto
- Associação do Instituto Superior Técnico para a Investigação e Desenvolvimento _IST-ID
- COFAC
- Escola Superior de Saúde do Politécnico do Porto
- ISCTE - Instituto Universitário de Lisboa
- Instituto Superior de Economia e Gestão
- Instituto Superior de Engenharia do Porto
- UNIVERSIDADE DE ÉVORA
- 2 more »
- « less
-
Field
-
of the candidate. 9. Scientific and curricular career evaluation focuses on relevance, quality and up-to-datedness: a) of scientific and technological production in the last five years, considered most relevant by
-
. Grading system: The Assessment of the Scientific and Curriculum Path (APCC) will be based on the Curriculum vitae presented by the candidate(s), and focused on the last 5 years of activity: A: CV quality
-
and curricular career of the candidate. 9. Scientific and curricular career evaluation focuses on relevance, quality and up-to-datedness: a) of scientific and technological production in the last five
-
of the candidate. 9. Scientific and curricular career evaluation focuses on relevance, quality and up-to-datedness: a) of scientific and technological production in the last five years, considered most relevant by
-
the supervisor according to the following criteria Quality of the work developed - 60%; Achieved results (publications; conference presentations) - 20%; Integration and relational skills - 20%. The criteria scores
-
for admission to this competition procedure, namely: a) Electronic application form for the tender procedure; b) Detailed curriculum vitae , structured in order to allow the evaluation of the relevance, quality
-
or the extended period requested, if accepted by the committee, with a weight of 80%, based on the following parameters: IV.2.1.1. Scientific, technological, cultural or artistic production: Relevance, quality and
-
the quality and relevance of the scientific production, and the professional activity indicated as more relevant by the candidate, within the scope of the project. Based on the assessment of the candidates
-
achievements in the last five (5) years, taking into consideration the quality and relevance of the scientific production, and the professional activity indicated as more relevant by the candidate, within
-
or artistic production: Relevance, quality and national and international recognition of the scientific, technological, cultural or artistic production, with particular focus on the works/papers selected as