Sort by
Refine Your Search
-
Listed
-
Category
-
Program
-
Field
-
100 points, ranking the candidates according to their classification consisting on the sum of the partial classifications assigned in each evaluation criterion, and considering the weighting factor
-
considering the weighting factor given to each parameter. In this process abstentions are not allowed. In the event of a tie among candidates with the same highest evaluation score, the Evaluation Panel
-
the weighting factor given to each parameter. In this process abstentions are not allowed. In the event of a tie among candidates with the same highest evaluation score, the Evaluation Panel reserves the right
-
factor given to each parameter. In this process abstentions are not allowed. In the event of a tie among candidates with the same highest evaluation score, the Evaluation Panel reserves the right
-
the candidates according to their classification consisting on the sum of the partial classifications assigned in each evaluation criterion, and considering the weighting factor given to each parameter. In
-
, ranking the candidates according to their classification consisting on the sum of the partial classifications assigned in each evaluation criterion, and considering the weighting factor given to each
-
criterion, and considering the weighting factor given to each parameter. In this process abstentions are not allowed. In the event of a tie among candidates with the same highest evaluation score
-
to their classification consisting on the sum of the partial classifications assigned in each evaluation criterion, and considering the weighting factor given to each parameter. In this process abstentions are not allowed
-
to their classification consisting on the sum of the partial classifications assigned in each evaluation criterion, and considering the weighting factor given to each parameter. In this process abstentions are not allowed
-
points, ranking the candidates according to their classification consisting on the sum of the partial classifications assigned in each evaluation criterion, and considering the weighting factor given